Development of Objectives to Inform a National Standardized Primary Palliative Care Curriculum for Health Professions Students.

Introduction: Despite recent educational advances, the need for a national standardized primary palliative care curriculum for health professions students remains evident. Methods: An interprofessional leadership team developed a set of core learning objectives built on previously published competencies. A survey was then sent to palliative care experts for feedback and consensus. Results: Twenty-eight of 31 objectives met a 75% consensus threshold, 2 were combined with others, and 12 were refined based on survey feedback. Discussion: With interprofessional input at all stages, we finalized a comprehensive list of 26 learning objectives for a primary palliative care curriculum targeting health professions students. These objectives will be widely available through an online course but can also be adopted for use by individual educators across health professions institutions. These objectives and related curriculum are critical to producing practice-ready clinicians who are prepared to care for the burgeoning population of seriously ill patients.

Blueprint for a Palliative Advanced Practice Registered Nurse Fellowship.

Opportunities for advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) to train for specialty palliative care practice are insufficient to meet workforce needs. Graduate nursing programs in the United States do not have uniform or required curricula in palliative and end-of-life care of the seriously ill. In clinical practice, APRNs acquire palliative care skills by a mix of on-the-job experience, self-study, and continuing education. While physician colleagues can pursue post-residency training in one of 156 accredited hospice and palliative medicine fellowships, there are fewer than a dozen fellowships for APRNs, each training between one and three nurse fellows for specialty palliative care practice. This disparity slows the pipeline of palliative nursing experts and leaders, taxes employers with significant training duties, and results in an APRN workforce without uniform training. There are grass roots initiatives-often by non-nursing educators-to adapt existing physician and interprofessional fellowships for nurse learners, both in palliative care and other specialties. While these efforts help meet staffing needs and promote interprofessionalism, these programs are built upon medical curricula and competencies rather than grounding from a nursing framework. Nursing fellowship directors may not have the same administrative support, protected nonclinical time, funding, or access to nursing mentors and faculty afforded to their medical counterparts. This article provides a blueprint for clinician educators from nursing or non-nursing disciplines, who want to develop or refine training programs for APRNs that adhere to palliative nursing standards and offer a curriculum integrated with supervised practice and mentorship.

Development of a Palliative Care Toolkit for the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to high numbers of critically ill and dying patients in need of expert management of dyspnea, delirium, and serious illness communication. The rapid spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome-Coronavirus-2 creates surges of infected patients requiring hospitalization and puts palliative care programs at risk of being overwhelmed by patients, families, and clinicians seeking help. In response to this unprecedented need for palliative care, our program sought to create a collection of palliative care resources for nonpalliative care clinicians. A workgroup of interdisciplinary palliative care clinicians developed the Palliative Care Toolkit, consisting of a detailed chapter in a COVID-19 online resource, a mobile and desktop Web application, one-page guides, pocket cards, and communication skills training videos. The suite of resources provides expert and evidence-based guidance on symptom management including dyspnea, pain, and delirium, as well as on serious illness communication, including conversations about goals of care, code status, and end of life. We also created a nurse resource hotline staffed by palliative care nurse practitioners and virtual office hours staffed by a palliative care attending physician. Since its development, the Toolkit has helped us disseminate best practices to nonpalliative care clinicians delivering primary palliative care, allowing our team to focus on the highest-need consults and increasing acceptance of palliative care across hospital settings.

Museum-Based Education: A Novel Educational Approach for Hospice and Palliative Medicine Training Programs.

Objective: To describe museum-based education (MBE) as an emerging pedagogy in our four hospice and palliative medicine (HPM) training programs. Background: MBE is a pedagogy that uses art and the museum space to promote a variety of skills, including reflective practice, self-awareness, and interprofessional teamwork. While MBE has been extensively applied and studied in undergraduate medical education, it is not a common educational strategy in HPM education. Methods: We summarize the characteristics of MBE initiatives in our institutions, including makeup of fellowship class, MBE site, facilitators, exercises, number of sessions, number of years using MBE, and expenses and funding to support MBE in our training programs. Results: To date, we have used MBE to train 104 HPM fellows. Evaluations from MBE have been overwhelmingly positive. Conclusion: MBE holds great promise as a pedagogic strategy to improve metacognition, tolerance of uncertainty, appreciation of multiple perspectives, and teamwork among hospice and palliative care professionals. Further research is needed to identify best practices for MBE across HPM training programs.

The global state of palliative care-progress and challenges in cancer care.

All persons have a right to palliative care during cancer treatment and at the end-of-life. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines palliative care as a medical specialty that addresses physical, psychological, social, legal, and spiritual domains of care by an interdisciplinary team of professional and lay health care providers. Widespread adoption of this universal definition will aid policy development and educational initiatives on a national level. The need for palliative care is expanding due to the aging of the world's population and the increase in the rate of cancer in both developed and developing countries. However, in one third of the world there is no access to palliative care for persons with serious or terminal illness. Palliative care improves symptoms, most frequently pain, and improves quality of life for patients and their families, especially in the terminal disease phase. Accessibility to palliative care services, adequately trained health care professionals, availability of essential medicines, and gaps in education vary greatly throughout the world. Pain management is an integral concept in the practice of palliative care; however, opioiphobia, insufficient supply of opioids, and regulatory restrictions contribute to undue suffering for millions. Ongoing advocacy efforts call for increased awareness, palliative care integration with cancer care, and public and professional education. Enacting necessary change will require the engagement of health ministries and the recognition of the unique needs and resources of each country. The aim of this review is to examine progress in palliative care development and explore some of the barriers influencing cancer care across the globe.

Education and referral criteria: impact on oncology referrals to palliative care.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a quality improvement project involving education and referral criteria to influence oncology provider referrals to a palliative care service. METHODS: A single group post-test only quasi-experimental design was used to evaluate palliative care service (PCS) referrals following an intervention consisting of a didactic presentation, education outreach visits (EOV) to key providers, and referral criteria. Data on patient demographics, cancer types, consult volume, reasons for referral, pre-consult length of stay, overall hospital stay, and discharge disposition were collected pre-intervention, then post-intervention for 7.5 months and compared. SETTING AND SAMPLE: Attending oncologists, nurse practitioner, and house staff from the solid tumor division at a 700-bed urban teaching hospital participated in the project. Two geriatricians, a palliative care nurse practitioner, and rotating geriatric fellows staffed the PCS. RESULTS: The percentage of oncology referrals to PCS increased significantly following the intervention (χ(2) = 6.108, p = .013). 24.9% (390) patients were referred in the 4.6 years pre-intervention and 31.5% (106) patients were referred during 7.5 months post-intervention. The proportion of consults for pain management was significantly greater post-intervention (χ(2) = 5.378, p = .02), compared to pre-intervention, when most referrals were related to end-of-life issues. Lung, pancreatic, and colon were the most common cancer types at both periods, and there were no significant differences in patient demographics, pre-referral length of hospitalization or overall hospital days. There was a trend toward more patients being discharged alive following the intervention. CONCLUSION: A quality improvement project supported the use of education and referral criteria to influence both the frequency and reasons for palliative care referral by oncology providers.

End-of-life care for hospitalized patients with lung cancer: utilization of a palliative care service.

PURPOSE: High symptom burden and hospital mortality among patients with lung cancer argues for early palliative care intervention. Patient characteristics and discharge dispositions in hospitalized patients with lung cancer receiving usual care were compared to those referred to a new palliative care service. METHODS: A retrospective database review of all lung cancer discharges receiving usual care (UC) and palliative care service (PCS) consultation was conducted. Demographics, length of stay, discharge disposition, and mortality were described and compared. Palliative Performance Scale scores were described according to discharge disposition in the PCS group. Disposition of all patients receiving either chemotherapy or surgery was also noted. RESULTS: A total of 1476 hospital discharges with a diagnosis of lung cancer occurred between March 15, 2006 and June 30, 2009. Among all discharges, 9% received chemotherapy and 29% had surgery. The PCS was consulted for 8% of all lung cancer patients most commonly to address end-of-life-issues. PCS patients were more likely to be at the end-of-life than UC patients as evidenced by higher hospital mortality (31% versus 7%), higher intensive care (ICU) mortality (67% versus 16%) and more frequent discharge to hospice (41% versus 7%). PCS patients were hospitalized a median of 6 days before a referral was made. Hospitalization was significantly longer for PCS patients (M = 16.3 days, p < 0.001) than UC patients (M = 8.3 days). CONCLUSIONS: In the first 3 years of a new palliative care initiative consults for lung cancer patients occurred late in the hospital stay or when death was imminent.

Palliative care for the cancer patient.

Palliation of symptoms to optimize QOL is the foundation of cancer care regardless of stage of disease or level of anticancer treatment. Patients commonly experience pain, constipation, nausea, vomiting, dyspnea, fatigue, and delirium. Many valid clinical tools are available to the primary care clinician to screen for symptoms, assess severity, measure treatment response, and elicit the patient's subjective symptom experience. Although there is limited evidence regarding the relative efficacy of symptom interventions from randomized controlled trials, clinical practice guidelines are available.

Multidisciplinary family meetings in the ICU facilitate end-of-life decision making.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of establishing a multi-disciplinary family meeting (MDFM) program and the impact of such a program on the end-of-life decision making in the setting of an ICU. METHODS: During the study period MDFMs were scheduled for patients requiring mechanical ventilation for 5 or more days. The meeting followed a structured format. The pertinent details of the meeting as well as the treatment goals were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were enrolled in this study. Thirty-five MDFM's were held on 24 patients. A meeting could not be arranged for four patients. All meetings addressed patient's diagnosis, prognosis and goals of care. Fifteen (52%) patients (9 of whom had metastatic malignancy) had life support withdrawal and died a mean of 4.8 + 4.2 days after the first family meeting. In the remaining 9 patients (3 with localized cancer and 6 with non-cancer diagnoses), the plan following the family meeting was to continue supportive care; all of these patients survived to hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Proactive MDFM's improve communication and understanding between patients' family and the treating team and facilitates end-of-life decision making.

Using methadone to treat opioid-induced hyperalgesia and refractory pain.

A patient was treated for several years with high doses of opioids for malignant pain. During a recent hospitalization, the patient's pain remained uncontrolled despite escalating doses of various opioids. We suspected that this patient suffered from the clinical phenomenon of opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH). The patient was then rotated from her other opioids to methadone, and her pain was adequately controlled within several days. Methadone, because of its NMDA antagonist properties, offers an effective treatment for OIH. The use of methadone for analgesia is complex and should be undertaken only by practitioners who have appropriate experience.

Graduate education in oncology nursing for minorities.

BACKGROUND: Cancer statistics reveal disturbing morbidity and mortality rates among minorities, especially African Americans. A program to recruit and train minority nurses as Oncology Advanced Practice Nurses was developed at the University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing. METHODS: Since 1992, 30 African American, five Asian/Pacific Islander, and five Hispanic nurses have been supported during advanced oncology nursing study. RESULTS: Graduates have assumed positions of clinical and academic leadership in oncology nursing. CONCLUSIONS: This project strengthened the ability of a graduate program in oncology nursing to respond to needs related to the education of minority students and to the care of minority populations with cancer.